Ross Assessment of Activities in the Middle East :: Politics Political Regimes Essays Papers

Ross Assessment of Activities in the Middle EastWinds of change continue to deny through lands traditionally ruled by cruel regimes, as the people of these nation-states set aside their fears and vote with their feet. Participation in nations such as Georgia, Ukraine, and Lebanon has increased, and the move lingers as to whether these changes will be merely a breeze, or have more far-reaching and lasting effects. As former U.S. envoy to the Middle East, Dennis Ross, comments on the situations in the Middle East, he analyzes possible outcomes and makes policy suggestions on how to catalyze and encourage further movement away from corrupt authoritarian regimes. In his assessment of activities in the Middle East, Ross recognizes the doubtfulness of any kind of swift and complete transition away from the corruption that so often characterizes the governments of the region. The nuclear situation in Iran, and cardinal of the proposals on how to deal with it, provide a small scale repres entation of the hassles that result from cooperative dealings. Just as the carrots-and-sticks approach to the situation in Iran presents the problem of Iran?s compliance with the terms, so does the general climate of the Middle East. The way in which a nation chooses to present itself and its actions does not always reflect what is actually occurring gestures and actions are not necessarily supported by genuine sentiment. Despite the fact that his calls for collective action by the United States, Europe, and Japan provide a hypothetically effective solution, the fear may arise that no action will be taken, regardless of the presence of an agreement. Though multilateralism seems to be a right(a) way of handling these issues of corruption, transition, and hopefully, liberalization, it is by no means foolproof. As long as self-interest is prioritized above collective interest on the international agendas of nations standardised the United States, multilateralism cannot be a sure-f ire solution. There exist no guarantees that the continued oppressiveness of various Middle Eastern regimes will prove the superlative threat to national and international security therefore, there lies the possibility that other issues prove to be more urgent and take precedence. As a result, nations come to in this agreement may have more pressing concerns to address, and choose to withdraw or not participate fully if a response is needed. Ross acknowledges the capableness of liberal activity in the region as a force with a possible spillover effect.